Many urban legends have stemmed out about the crying statue of mother Mary. A lot of people would say that it is the work of some sort of supernatural force while the Catholic church would call it a miracle on earth. Despite all of this though, it is very interesting to look into the overall story of the weeping statue mary to know whether this is fact or fiction.
In order to know more about the phenomenon, it is crucial to look at one of the first cases. Probably the earliest documented one was in a church in Siracusa, Sicily sometime during the year 1953. According to the reports, the Virgin Mother statue cried tears straight from her eyes for everyone in the vicinity to see.
This prompted a lot of followers to witness the phenomenon and even video taped while it was happening. Due to this leaking, there were many unsolved questions that were popping up as to why this happened in the first place. Of course, the more hardcore followers believed that it was a sign of faith and that God was trying to speak to them through divine intervention.
This was not the only isolated case though as there was another popular case that popped up in Brisbane in the year 2004. This one involved religious figures inside the Inala Vietnamese Catholic Centre. According to the case, the Holy Mother figure bled a red substance that looked like blood and scented oil. Aside from these two, there were many more cases that popped out.
As expected though, many people have been trying to find a logical explanation for this. One of which was made by Dr Luigi Garlaschelli from the University of Pavia. In order to find the logical cause, he tried making his own holy mother figure and tried to make it weep without any electronic gadget or external help.
He made his own structure out of a plaster material that had a glazing that could absorb water. While the glazing did absorb water, a small crack or a rip in the material could make the water come out. Now, he tried to scratch the eyes portion a bit and found out that the water absorbed by the plaster did come out from the eyes looking like the statue was crying.
Now, the Brisbane incident was a little bit more sketchy than the Sicily incident because it was proven that manmade assistance was behind the phenomenon. A team assembled by Archbishop Bathersby was able to find out that the blood was not real blood and some other liquid that looked like blood. Also, the scented oil was proven to be able to be bought in any store that sells oils. Finally, it was discovered that there were holes in the eyes of the figure.
While the Brisbane incident was pretty much proven to be a hoax, the Sicily incident was never concluded by Garlaschelli. The original crying holy mother was already locked away in the church and was not to be touch by anyone except staffed authorized. With that, Garlaschelli could only give a possible scientific explanation for the phenomenon but not a concrete one since he could never examine the actual figure.
In order to know more about the phenomenon, it is crucial to look at one of the first cases. Probably the earliest documented one was in a church in Siracusa, Sicily sometime during the year 1953. According to the reports, the Virgin Mother statue cried tears straight from her eyes for everyone in the vicinity to see.
This prompted a lot of followers to witness the phenomenon and even video taped while it was happening. Due to this leaking, there were many unsolved questions that were popping up as to why this happened in the first place. Of course, the more hardcore followers believed that it was a sign of faith and that God was trying to speak to them through divine intervention.
This was not the only isolated case though as there was another popular case that popped up in Brisbane in the year 2004. This one involved religious figures inside the Inala Vietnamese Catholic Centre. According to the case, the Holy Mother figure bled a red substance that looked like blood and scented oil. Aside from these two, there were many more cases that popped out.
As expected though, many people have been trying to find a logical explanation for this. One of which was made by Dr Luigi Garlaschelli from the University of Pavia. In order to find the logical cause, he tried making his own holy mother figure and tried to make it weep without any electronic gadget or external help.
He made his own structure out of a plaster material that had a glazing that could absorb water. While the glazing did absorb water, a small crack or a rip in the material could make the water come out. Now, he tried to scratch the eyes portion a bit and found out that the water absorbed by the plaster did come out from the eyes looking like the statue was crying.
Now, the Brisbane incident was a little bit more sketchy than the Sicily incident because it was proven that manmade assistance was behind the phenomenon. A team assembled by Archbishop Bathersby was able to find out that the blood was not real blood and some other liquid that looked like blood. Also, the scented oil was proven to be able to be bought in any store that sells oils. Finally, it was discovered that there were holes in the eyes of the figure.
While the Brisbane incident was pretty much proven to be a hoax, the Sicily incident was never concluded by Garlaschelli. The original crying holy mother was already locked away in the church and was not to be touch by anyone except staffed authorized. With that, Garlaschelli could only give a possible scientific explanation for the phenomenon but not a concrete one since he could never examine the actual figure.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about a Weeping Statue Mary, come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.thesetonmiracles.org/other-weeping-events now.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire