While there are many people who do not want to die, especially at their own hand or that of another, assisted suicide is a topic that has long been discussed. It is defined as suicide that is committed with help of another individual. When the other person is a doctor, this is referred to as physician aided death. This occurs when doctors intentionally and knowingly provide an individual with the means or knowledge to kill themselves.
Physician-assisted suicide, which may also be known as PAS, may include doctors providing counseling to their patients on drug dosage that is lethal. They could also prescribe this dosage to them or personally supply them with it. Another name for this practice is assisted dying, which is considered a euphemism. This action is not the same as euthanasia or mercy killing. In those cases, physicians have physically administered the death through lethal drug.
PAS is done with the consent and request of patients. These individuals will self-administer what is needed to cause the death. This is an interest for a lot of people. The conversation associated with this touches on a number of issues related to law, religion, morals, society and ethics. This practice, after all, involves a form of suicide and murder.
Some people may wonder what drives people to this decision. Often times people requesting this have life-limiting sicknesses or chronic illnesses. They might have lost sight of hope in regaining control of their health situation and life. Plus, many feel physical pain and overall discomfort that cannot be remedied. Aided death might be a way that they feel they have some control again, being able to choose how they want to end their lives.
This act has been legalized in Columbia, Australia and Japan. Still, it is considered illegal in most other areas of the world and still remains a topic of controversy. People who are suffering might see this as the only option they have. In fact, they could welcome death because it seems like a preferred reality to the illness and pain they are experiencing. Sometimes loved ones are encouraging and respectful of this decision, but every situation is different.
Most patients in this situation seek a better quality of life that they feel as if they cannot achieve. They may be in a bad state of physical suffering, which is expected to reduce quality of life. Frustration may also be present if they know that there is nothing that doctors can do to make them better. Opponents also have their concerns, such as: medical ethics, risk to public safety, roles of physicians, religious ethics, prejudices against disabled persons and the slippery slope argument.
Research is encouraged. There are numerous resources with valuable information about this topic. Many have taken a stance against this, but there are certain organizations that have been created to show support for PAS.
Knowledge about this process is fundamental to forming an opinion about it. Many feel this is not the answer, but they are not in the same position as the people who consider it. Suicide can be difficult to understand and accept.
Physician-assisted suicide, which may also be known as PAS, may include doctors providing counseling to their patients on drug dosage that is lethal. They could also prescribe this dosage to them or personally supply them with it. Another name for this practice is assisted dying, which is considered a euphemism. This action is not the same as euthanasia or mercy killing. In those cases, physicians have physically administered the death through lethal drug.
PAS is done with the consent and request of patients. These individuals will self-administer what is needed to cause the death. This is an interest for a lot of people. The conversation associated with this touches on a number of issues related to law, religion, morals, society and ethics. This practice, after all, involves a form of suicide and murder.
Some people may wonder what drives people to this decision. Often times people requesting this have life-limiting sicknesses or chronic illnesses. They might have lost sight of hope in regaining control of their health situation and life. Plus, many feel physical pain and overall discomfort that cannot be remedied. Aided death might be a way that they feel they have some control again, being able to choose how they want to end their lives.
This act has been legalized in Columbia, Australia and Japan. Still, it is considered illegal in most other areas of the world and still remains a topic of controversy. People who are suffering might see this as the only option they have. In fact, they could welcome death because it seems like a preferred reality to the illness and pain they are experiencing. Sometimes loved ones are encouraging and respectful of this decision, but every situation is different.
Most patients in this situation seek a better quality of life that they feel as if they cannot achieve. They may be in a bad state of physical suffering, which is expected to reduce quality of life. Frustration may also be present if they know that there is nothing that doctors can do to make them better. Opponents also have their concerns, such as: medical ethics, risk to public safety, roles of physicians, religious ethics, prejudices against disabled persons and the slippery slope argument.
Research is encouraged. There are numerous resources with valuable information about this topic. Many have taken a stance against this, but there are certain organizations that have been created to show support for PAS.
Knowledge about this process is fundamental to forming an opinion about it. Many feel this is not the answer, but they are not in the same position as the people who consider it. Suicide can be difficult to understand and accept.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire